Outreach
Cold email that gets replies
The structure, the subject lines, a full worked example, and the mistakes that quietly cost you every reply.
The structure: praise, problem, cost, fix, ask
- 1
Genuine, specific praise. One or two lines about something they are actually doing well. It has to be something you could only know by looking.
- 2
The problem. The gap that success or that setup creates. Frame it from the outside: 'from the outside it looks like…'.
- 3
The cost. What ignoring it costs in hours, spend or lost revenue at their scale. Directional and honest — never a fabricated figure.
- 4
The fix. One line saying you solve exactly that, then three bullets naming real services and the outcome each creates.
- 5
The easy start. Small scope, fast setup, no long commitment, so saying yes feels cheap.
- 6
One question. A single, low-effort ask. Two questions roughly halve your reply rate.
Subject lines that get opened and read
Name their company or problem. 'the gap in acme's onboarding flow' beats 'quick question' every time.
Stay lowercase and short. Four to eight words reads like a person, not a campaign.
No clickbait, no emoji. Curiosity you cannot pay off costs you the second email.
Never fake a thread. 'Re:' on a first email is the fastest way to lose trust.
A full example you can adapt
Subject: acme's support load after the launch
Hi Priya, the new self-serve onboarding you shipped last month is genuinely well done — the setup flow is clearer than most tools twice your size. From the outside though, it looks like support is absorbing the questions the flow does not answer yet, which is usually where a team your size loses a few hours a day and a handful of trials each month.
That is exactly what we fix. How we would fix it: onboarding audit — find the three steps causing most tickets; in-product guidance — answer the question where it is asked; support deflection reporting — show what it saved. We can start with a two-week scoped audit, nothing long-term. Worth a fifteen-minute look next week?
The mistakes that kill cold email
'I hope this email finds you well'. Signals a template in the first six words.
Talking about yourself first. Nobody reads paragraph two of a company introduction.
Fabricated statistics. One invented number and the whole message becomes untrustworthy.
Bracketed blanks. [client name] and [X%] prove the message was never personalized.
More than one ask. Every extra question lowers the chance of any answer.
Ignoring deliverability. A perfect email in the spam folder scores zero. Warm the domain first.
Follow-ups that add value instead of noise
'Just bumping this up' is a message that asks for time and gives nothing. Every follow-up should carry a new angle, a relevant example, or a genuinely useful resource, and the last one should make it easy to say no. A clean breakup email frequently earns more replies than the original.
Frequently asked questions
What is a good cold email reply rate?
One to two percent is typical for generic blasts. Researched, personalized outreach to a tight list commonly lands between five and fifteen percent. If you are below one percent, the list or the deliverability is the problem, not the wording.
How long should a cold email be?
Between 90 and 200 words for most B2B offers. Long enough to prove you understand their business and to name what you do, short enough to read on a phone without scrolling twice.
What subject line works best for cold email?
Lowercase, four to eight words, naming their company or the specific problem. 'quick question' and clickbait get opened and then ignored; specificity gets opened and read.
Should I include a link in the first cold email?
Prefer not to. Links in a first touch hurt deliverability and give the reader an excuse to postpone. Offer the resource and send it after they say yes.
How many follow-ups should I send?
Four to six touches over two to three weeks, mixing email and LinkedIn, each with something new. Stop the moment anyone replies.
Keep reading
Let the research write the first line
GoodReply reads the prospect's site and drafts the praise, the problem, the cost and the fix — already in this structure.
Try GoodReply free